>
The Halving of Bitcoin: Why Things Might Be Different This Time

The Halving of Bitcoin: Why Things Might Be Different This Time

Jan 16 Tech Standard

There will soon be a fourth Bitcoin halving, bringing the supply down to 3.125 BTC per block. This recurring event, which occurs every four years, highlights the core allure of Bitcoin—its limited supply of 21 million coins. The demand and belief in Bitcoin as a better form of money are mostly driven by the steady decrease in supply. Furthermore, the halving triggers a dramatic change in miner incentives, as they become more dependent on transaction fee income from users executing on-chain Bitcoin transactions rather than newly created coins.

In the past, Bitcoin's price has increased in tandem with halvings, lessening the effect of lower miner subsidies. Because miners must pay with fiat money, a higher price for bitcoin insulates income. Recent market cycles, however, indicate that this presumption might not always be true—especially now that the inflation rate is below 1%. If the subsequent cycle is identical to the previous one, this halving may have a detrimental impact on current miners.

Because of halvings, miners are depending more and more on transaction fee income. Prices must double every halving, or fees must increase, for sustainability. It is risky to anticipate a price guarantee of double every four years. The mempool has been greatly affected by BRC-20 tokens and inscriptions, which have increased fees from 0.1–0.2 BTC each block to a variable average of 1-2 BTC, frequently jumping higher.

This Time's Novel Factor

This halving introduces a novel dynamic with Ordinals Theory, attributing rarity values to specific sats based on block significance. "Epic" sats from the first block of each halving cycle might gain substantial market demand, potentially exceeding the value of the coinbase reward in fungible satoshis. This marks the first halving since the widespread adoption of Ordinal Theory by some Bitcoin users.

After the halving, miners might compete for the highly prized "epic" sat, which could provide an incentive for blockchain restructuring. Although it's not a given, the financial incentive is substantial. A competition amongst miners for the greater coinbase reward occurs in this scenario, which was last observed during the initial halving. The market value of the "epic" sat and its capacity to make up for lost revenue due to the block dispute will determine how long the outcome takes. Compared to previous occurrences, this halve could be especially fascinating.

How a Legendary Sat Battle Might Proceed

There could be several outcomes. First off, nothing could happen if miners decide that the energy and opportunity cost of a blockchain reorganization is not worth the potential market value of the first "epic" stake. On the other hand, smaller operations choose not to participate, causing less disturbance, while larger-scale mining operations may run the danger of getting into reorg wars for the "epic" sat. This might occur if miners notice an ordinal premium, but not enough of one to cause a noticeable disruption to the network.

In the third scenario, if a market emerges with pre-halving bids for the "epic" sat, miners may engage in an extended battle over that block. Miners can assess the clear market value of the "epic" sat, allowing them to gauge how long they can delay moving to the next block and still profit. This could result in significant network disruption until miners approach a point of guaranteed loss, prompting them to prioritize block mining over the "epic" sat. Regardless, this factor is likely to be a consideration in each future halving unless demand for ordinals diminishes.

 

 

HarshitKulhan

Crafting cinematic stories through the lens of my phone, I am a blogger and content writer who expresses the essence of my blogs through words

What do you think?

Show comments / Leave a comment

You are not Signed in